Liberals will do anything to destroy conservative candidates, including invent unprovable assertions that they cannot be held accountable to. Liberals want to run Obama against Romney for two reasons:
- Romney is so liberal that the choice between Obama and Romney will be meaningless for many voters and apathy and cause a low conservative turnout.
- If Romney wins, then liberals have the RINO Romney. Prediction: if Romney gets the republican nomination they will immediately start painting him with 'liberal' and 'moderate' labels. They will hold off until the nomination.
In the meantime, they will destroy any conservative like Perry or Cain, as best they can. How will they do that? The easiest way to destroy any sensible argument is with unprovable ad hominem attacks. As related in the book 365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy,
...if you are debating immigration, [liberals] will accuse you of being a 'racist'; if you're worried about radical Islam, you're 'Islamophobic'; if you want your kids to be taught properly at school, you're an 'elitist'; if you think marriage requires one man and one woman, you're 'homophobic'; if you think there are rather obvious differences between men and women, you're a 'sexist'; and so on. This technique says: 'My opponent is so satanically evil that what little truth he has to utter is irredeemably tainted by his depravity.'Ed Shultz is skilled at this, his latest rant accuses Mr. Cain, Republican presidential candidate, of pandering to "white Republicans out there who don't like black folks." The 'pandering' in question? "I don't believe racism in this country today holds anybody back in a big way," Cain said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
Are there some elements of racism? Yes. It gets back to if we don't grow this economy, that is a ripple effect for every economic level, and because blacks are more disproportionately unemployed, they get hit the worst when economic policies don't work. That's where it starts.Well there is plenty of support for Mr Cain's statement, starting with the office of President of the United States. But lets set all that aside, we could be here for hours with examples of black success.
The real issue is the unprovable attack on Mr Cain It is typical liberal double talk. For white people they are afraid of, they label them racist. With Mr. Cain, they say he is appealing to racists. Ed Schultz also has two pansies on his show to pantomime his attack. Ed Schultz doesn't have a guest to support Mr. Cain. One says that Mr. Cain is appealing to "post-intentional racism" - racism that people don't intend to have or to act upon. The other says "It's almost as if this guy is trying to warm up to [the racists] and tell them what they want to hear." All totally unprovable.
Of course, if Mr. Cain is right, as I think he is, then there is no need for the liberal machine to grind out laws favoring minorities anymore, is there? There wouldn't be a need for all the entitlements, special housing or safety nets. In a world of equal opportunity, there's no need for liberals at all. That is why they hate Mr. Cain for speaking truth. The emperor has no clothes.
It used to be, liberals passed laws against thought crimes in their quest for power. Now they are accusing their opponents of un-thought crimes... you don't have to even think it to be guilty now.
There is hardly a fact in Ed Shultz show, but he has a million viewers, if you believe the ratings. He runs for election every day with his sponsors. It's about time to boycott them and end the charade.