Wednesday, December 02, 2009

Leftist Media Bias of the Day

Apparently, the mainstream media can't afford fact checkers:
  • Columnist Joel Achenbach in the November 25th Washington Post:
    President George W. Bush once boasted, "I'm not a textbook player, I'm a gut player." The new tenant of the Oval Office takes a strikingly different approach. President Obama is almost defiantly deliberative, methodical and measured, even when critics accuse him of dithering. When describing his executive style, he goes into Spock mode, saying, "You've got to make decisions based on information and not emotions."

    Obama's handling of the Afghanistan conundrum has been a spectacle of deliberation unlike anything seen in the White House in recent memory. The strategic review began in September. Again and again, the war council convened in the Situation Room. The president mulled an array of unappealing options. Next week, finally, he will tell the American public the outcome of all this strategizing.

    "He's establishing his decision-making process as being almost diametrically the opposite of the previous administration," says Lawrence Wilkerson, a retired Army colonel who served as Secretary of State Colin L. Powell's chief of staff. Wilkerson, who teaches national security decision-making at George Washington University, says the Bush-Cheney style was "cowboy-like, typical Texas, typical Wyoming, and extremely secretive."
  • President George W. Bush announcing the Iraq surge on January 10, 2007:
    The situation in Iraq is unacceptable to the American people -- and it is unacceptable to me. Our troops in Iraq have fought bravely. They have done everything we have asked them to do. Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me.

    It is clear that we need to change our strategy in Iraq. So my national security team, military commanders, and diplomats conducted a comprehensive review. We consulted members of Congress from both parties, our allies abroad, and distinguished outside experts. We benefitted from the thoughtful recommendations of the Iraq Study Group, a bipartisan panel led by former Secretary of State James Baker and former Congressman Lee Hamilton. In our discussions, we all agreed that there is no magic formula for success in Iraq. And one message came through loud and clear: Failure in Iraq would be a disaster for the United States.
As I've asked:
does the left-wing media still employ fact checkers? If so, does the job description say "ignorance of Google essential"? With such staggeringly undemanding duties, can I get that job? I promise never to Google again.
(via Best of the Web's James Taranto, who adds that "Achenbach's eagerness to portray Obama's vacillation in a positive light reinforces another stereotype: that of journalists as courtiers rather than critics of the "new" president.")


GW said...

Personally I think sycophant a better description of our current press.

Anonymous said...

I favor "His Majesty's Sackbutts."

--Scurvy Oaks

OBloodyHell said...

> I favor "His Majesty's Sackbutts."

"Obama's Other Teabaggers" has a better ring to it.