- CNN's description: "Legal experts consider the 55-year-old Alito so ideologically similar to Justice Antonin Scalia that he has earned the nickname 'Scalito.'"
- Alito himself: Dissenting in the abortion rights case that ultimately became Planned Parenthood v. Casey at the Supreme Court, when reviewed by the Third Circuit:
It is apparent that the Pennsylvania legislature considered this problem and attempted to prevent Section 3209 from causing adverse effects by adopting the four exceptions noted above. Whether the legislature’s approach represents sound public policy is not a question for us to decide. Our task here is simply to decide whether Section 3209 meets constitutional standards.
Booyeah! - Senator Charles Schumer's (D-NY) reaction:
It is sad that the President felt he had to pick a nominee likely to divide America instead of choosing a nominee in the mold of Sandra Day O’Connor, who would unify us.
This controversial nominee, who would make the Court less diverse and far more conservative, will get very careful scrutiny from the Senate and from the American people.
Aristotle-to-Ricardo-to-Hayek turn the double play way better than Plato-to-Rousseau-to-Rawls
Monday, October 31, 2005
Supreme Scalito
It's Alito, Samuel Alito, a judge on the Third Circuit. Patterico was prepared, defending Alito yesterday. And Judge Alito has a long and strong record on which to rely, including 15 years on the Federal bench. From Patterico and others, here's the top three arguments favoring confirmation:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I can't wait for the upcoming filibuster fight.
There is going to be a filibuster fight on this one.
I think the Repubs will end up changing the rules.
I think there will be an attempt for a filibuster, but it may very well be shut down before it gets nuked. Either way, we win.
Like Roberts, Alito will be confirmed without fuss--but if Dems want a fight, bring it on!
Post a Comment