Staking out new ground on Iraq, Sen. John Kerry said Monday he would not have overthrown Saddam Hussein had he been in the White House. . .Kerry must presume voters can't remember his opposite approach less than 2 months ago: "Sen. John Kerry said Monday he would have voted to authorize the war in Iraq knowing what he does now."
"Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who deserves his own special place in hell," he added. "But that was not, in itself, a reason to go to war. The satisfaction we take in his downfall does not hide this fact: We have traded a dictator for a chaos that has left America less secure."
I shouldn't be surprised anymore. But I thought the height of absurdity was when Navy-in-Vietnam Kerry became the medal-tossing protester, and then transformed into a Swiftboat 'hero' "reporting for duty." Now, just on Iraq alone, Kerry has:
- Voted against the first gulf war, then claimed he supported it.
- Voted for the invasion of Iraq, then against funding the troops there.
- Said he agreed with Bush's decision to invade, and now guesses (for that's all it is) America would be safer without the invasion.
No comments:
Post a Comment