Another example of a tactic masquerading as a principle is contemporary liberalism's fixation with the idea that the working and middle class should "vote their interests," by which they mean vote for the most government goodies. This was the point of Obama's "bitter" and "clinging" comments last summer. Those poor deluded souls in western Pennsylvania don't understand that their real interests lie with Obama's economic agenda. . .
This has always struck me as hypocritical, pernicious lunacy. Legitimate election issues are those issues voters decide are legitimate. Americans who cling to religion and guns don't do so out of bitterness, but because they consider such things central to their understanding of the good life and resent what they perceive as hostility to their lifestyle from their own government. And no liberal opposes voting on values issues -- including gay rights -- when they think they're right or if they believe it helps get liberals elected. Liberals denounce rich people who vote their interests as "greedy" and celebrate limousine liberals who vote against their own interests as heroes. And at least some of the folks who voted for Obama did so not because of their pocketbooks, but because of the symbolism inherent to Obama's candidacy.
Aristotle-to-Ricardo-to-Hayek turn the double play way better than Plato-to-Rousseau-to-Rawls
Thursday, November 13, 2008
QOTD
Jonah Goldberg on National Review Online:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Yes! Rich liberals think themselves noble when they vote against their economic interest because of their views on social issues. When working-class conservatives do likewise, rich liberals think them stupid. And then they wonder why working-class conservatives find rich liberals patronizing.
--Scurvy Oaks
Agreed.
> the idea that the working and middle class should "vote their interests,"
> And no liberal opposes voting on values issues -- including gay rights -- when they think they're right or if they believe it helps get liberals elected. Liberals denounce rich people who vote their interests as "greedy" and celebrate limousine liberals who vote against their own interests as heroes.
...Yet another case of "do as I instruct you, not as I'm doing"
A hypocritical Democrat?
Hey, Whoodathunkit?
Post a Comment