Friday, November 28, 2008

About That Consensus, Part 4

As reported in Politico:
Climate change skeptics on Capitol Hill are quietly watching a growing accumulation of global cooling science and other findings that could signal that the science behind global warming may still be too shaky to warrant cap-and-trade legislation.

While the new Obama administration promises aggressive, forward-thinking environmental policies, Weather Channel co-founder Joseph D’Aleo and other scientists are organizing lobbying efforts to take aim at the cap-and-trade bill that Democrats plan to unveil in January. . .

Armed with statistics from the Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climate Data Center, D’Aleo reported in the 2009 Old Farmer’s Almanac that the U.S. annual mean temperature has fluctuated for decades and has only risen 0.21 degrees since 1930 -- which he says is caused by fluctuating solar activity levels and ocean temperatures, not carbon emissions.

Data from the same source shows that during five of the past seven decades, including this one, average U.S. temperatures have gone down. And the almanac predicted that the next year will see a period of cooling.

"We’re worried that people are too focused on carbon dioxide as the culprit," D’Aleo said. "Recent warming has stopped since 1998, and we want to stop draconian measures that will hurt already spiraling downward economics. We’re environmentalists and conservationists at heart, but we don’t think that carbon is responsible for hurricanes."

D’Aleo’s organization, the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project, is collaborating on the campaign with the Cooler Heads Coalition, a subgroup of the National Consumer Coalition with members including Americans for Tax Reform, the National Center for Policy Analysis and Citizens for a Sound Economy.

More than 31,000 scientists across the world have signed the Global Warming Petition Project, a declaration started by a group of American scientists that states man’s impact on climate change can’t be reasonably proven.

If the project gains traction, it might give skeptical lawmakers an additional weapon to fight cap-and-trade legislation to curtail greenhouse gases -- a move they worry could damage the already fragile economy. At the least, congressional aides say, it could caution additional lawmakers from rushing into a hasty piece of legislation.
Reminder: Starting 18 months ago, I predicted that warming rhetoric--like Bush derangement syndrome--will fade starting January 20th. The new Administration need not admit that warming alarmists are wrong, just that we can't afford to address it now. (There's a similar debate in the EU; naturally, Senator John Kerry's hilariously out-of-step.) As reader OBH says, "no one ever said Obama was stupid. Unwise, yeah, but stupid? No."

(via Planet Gore)

2 comments:

Assistant Village Idiot said...

It leaves an interesting puzzle for the right: do we want a candidate who lies to us and then does what he wants, or lies to our opposition and then does what he wants?

Carl said...

Doesn't that depend on whether what he wants is conservative?