I have to say, I'm not that overly impressed with Fabius. I toss off a throwaway comment about solar cells, he jumps on it, I respond with a thorough refutation, and he expresses annoyance with the fact that it's taken the thread OT and then tries to defend the original comment rather ineptly...
Further examination of Fabius's site suggests a bit of liberal twititude.
The description of American "empire" is treated seriously, and I find a considerable amount of pessimism about the future of technological society there, too.
It seems moderately rational, so it's not as bad as most liberal places, but they do seem to take sources like the National Resources Defense Council seriously, lending me to doubt much of what they put forth as fact.
I put it on the same level as Lew Rockwell. Not unable to have some valid stuff, but take anything and everything there with a strong measure of salt.
2 comments:
I have to say, I'm not that overly impressed with Fabius. I toss off a throwaway comment about solar cells, he jumps on it, I respond with a thorough refutation, and he expresses annoyance with the fact that it's taken the thread OT and then tries to defend the original comment rather ineptly...
Further examination of Fabius's site suggests a bit of liberal twititude.
The description of American "empire" is treated seriously, and I find a considerable amount of pessimism about the future of technological society there, too.
It seems moderately rational, so it's not as bad as most liberal places, but they do seem to take sources like the National Resources Defense Council seriously, lending me to doubt much of what they put forth as fact.
I put it on the same level as Lew Rockwell. Not unable to have some valid stuff, but take anything and everything there with a strong measure of salt.
Post a Comment