Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Lawbreakers 1, Citizens 0

According to the Washington Times,
A Maryland-based immigrant-advocacy group is distributing guidebooks instructing those targeted by federal immigration agents during job-site raids not to cooperate with authorities if they are arrested or detained.

The eight-page, two-color illustrated book lists what rights "people who are not United States citizens" have if detained by immigration agents, details what to do if served with a warrant or charged with a crime, and urges them to remain silent if they are arrested.

The book also says they should refuse to provide authorities with any information about their immigration status. . .

The book [. . .] features cartoonlike drawings of armed black and white police officers escorting Hispanic men in handcuffs and shows babies crying because their fathers are behind bars.
The book also advises:
Do not carry papers from another country. If you do, the government can use this information in a deportation proceeding.
As Raven at And Rightly So observes, wouldn't this "right" make illegals better off than citizens? I propose an empirical test: Try withholding your Passport the next time you land in Heathrow.

The handout is authored and distributed by CASA of Maryland Inc., which advocates, "strong, economically and ethnically diverse communities in which all people -- especially women, low-income people, and workers -- can participate and benefit fully, regardless of their immigration status." CASA's causes include a "moratorium on deportation" of illegals and extending governmental college loans and financial aid to illegal aliens as if they were citizen/residents. CASA also runs two "worker centers" where employers hire day help "for jobs involving moving, packing, transporting, and deep cleaning." CASA implies that workers at its centers might be neither citizens nor lawful residents--without papers, such employment is unlawful.

Immigration historically has fueled American strength and growth. My father entered America with assets totaling 86 cents and knowing no English; became a citizen; went on to college and graduate school; then worked -- and was taxed -- for over 30 years. I salute anyone who, like my Father, follows the rules. I'd even support expanding current quotas. But the law requires passport first, documentation and citizenship later.

Illegal immigrants flout all three. Why should we welcome anyone whose first act on U.S. soil breaks American law?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.