Saturday, January 07, 2006

Blindness

Liberal stalwarts like Al Gore, both Senators from Massachusetts, and WaPo columnist Richard Cohen still deny Saddam supported Islamic terrorism. Even after eyewitness testimony and earlier intel confirmed the link. Even after Ayman al-Zawahiri, Al Qaeda's number 2, claims credit for a hallucinatory terrorist win in Iraq. Even though President Clinton, and his cabinet, said the opposite in the 1990s.

Suddenly, left-wing see-, hear- and speak-no-evil is besieged by new evidence. You see, coalition forces found acres of papers in Hussein's palaces; translation has lagged, with public release oddly blocked or delayed. But the data to date show "the connections between Saddam and terrorists were substantial and significant," as the reporter responsible for prodding the Pentagon -- the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes -- explains:
The former Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein trained thousands of radical Islamic terrorists from the region at camps in Iraq over the four years immediately preceding the U.S. invasion, according to documents and photographs recovered by the U.S. military in postwar Iraq. The existence and character of these documents has been confirmed to The Weekly Standard by eleven U.S. government officials.

The secret training took place primarily at three camps--in Samarra, Ramadi, and Salman Pak--and was directed by elite Iraqi military units. Interviews by U.S. government interrogators with Iraqi regime officials and military leaders corroborate the documentary evidence. Many of the fighters were drawn from terrorist groups in northern Africa with close ties to al Qaeda, chief among them Algeria's GSPC and the Sudanese Islamic Army. Some 2,000 terrorists were trained at these Iraqi camps each year from 1999 to 2002, putting the total number at or above 8,000. Intelligence officials believe that some of these terrorists returned to Iraq and are responsible for attacks against Americans and Iraqis. According to three officials with knowledge of the intelligence on Iraqi training camps, White House and National Security Council officials were briefed on these findings in May 2005; senior Defense Department officials subsequently received the same briefing.

The photographs and documents on Iraqi training camps come from a collection of some 2 million "exploitable items" captured in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan. They include handwritten notes, typed documents, audiotapes, videotapes, compact discs, floppy discs, and computer hard drives. Taken together, this collection could give U.S. intelligence officials and policymakers an inside look at the activities of the former Iraqi regime in the months and years before the Iraq war.

The discovery of the information on jihadist training camps in Iraq would seem to have two major consequences: It exposes the flawed assumptions of the experts and U.S. intelligence officials who told us for years that a secularist like Saddam Hussein would never work with Islamic radicals, any more than such jihadists would work with an infidel like the Iraqi dictator. It also reminds us that valuable information remains buried in the mountain of documents recovered in Afghanistan and Iraq over the past four years. . .

Speaking of Ansar al Islam, the al Qaeda-linked terrorist group that operated in northern Iraq, the former high-ranking military intelligence officer says: "There is no question about the fact that AI had reach into Baghdad. There was an intelligence connection between that group and the regime, a financial connection between that group and the regime, and there was an equipment connection. It may have been the case that the IIS [Iraqi Intelligence Service] support for AI was meant to operate against the [anti-Saddam] Kurds. But there is no question IIS was supporting AI."

The official continued: "[Saddam] used these groups because he was interested in extending his influence and extending the influence of Iraq. There are definite and absolute ties to terrorism. The evidence is there, especially at the network level. How high up in the government was it sanctioned? I can't tell you. I don't know whether it was run by Qusay [Hussein] or [Izzat Ibrahim] al-Duri or someone else. I'm just not sure. But to say Iraq wasn't involved in terrorism is flat wrong."
Dear Dems: "how many times can a man turn his head/Pretending he just doesn't see?" Forever, says A.J. Strata, unless we "unleash the Blogosphere!" Consider it done.

(via Michelle Malkin, NIF, Instapundit, FullosseousFlap) MINOR EDITS 6:45pm

1 comment:

MaxedOutMama said...

"The answer my friend, is blowing in the wind..."

I'm afraid that this is a pit people have dug for themselves in order to hide from what is a genuinely unpleasant reality. The programmed response to more unpleasant reality seems to be to dig deeper....

Dr. Sanity and Shrinkwrapped may be right to adopt a psychological explanation for this. What other explanation can there be? Carl, you have expertly and devastatingly chronicled the complete irrationality of the mindset of the press and the Deaniacs, but facts can't convince these people.

I think you do a great service for those who are simply not getting the truth from the press, and of course the majority of the American citizenry is not crazed. I am coming to the conclusion that the majority of the press is both psychologically unstable and badly educated, however.