Don't miss two posts by admitted dork MaxedOutMama, showing that global warming has nothing to do with CO2 emissions. Rather, warming appears to be a product of increased sunspot activity. But Kyoto is based on CO2; if greenhouse gasses aren't the cause, the West is flushing money down the toilet ($66 billion so far to slow warming by 0.000683091 °C).
Still think global warming is "consensus" or science? It ain't--it's what passes for a wet dream in academia. Science is what's falsible; environmentalism lacks logic, its unprovable doctrines are akin to religion. In fact, though greenies won't admit it, the hockey-stick curve-fit don't fit the data (R2 = 0.02), meaning, "the sign is correct only 54% of the time just better than random, the product mean test has a t-distribution and is insignificant, the CE statistic is negative. No wonder they don’t want anyone to look at these statistics."
Last year, warming charlatans received over $2 billion in U.S. government funding. Meaning we're paying for warming follies twice. Imagine the savings if we simply gave every tenured climatologist a 12-month supply of Viagra? Remember, we're talking about professors: call it 10 pills, about $50 a year. What's in your wallet?