Actually, I do get it--once again, liberals lie.
MORE:
NRO's Kate O'Beirne:
Walter Pincus and Bob Woodward have different recollections about a possible conversation about Joe Wilson's wife and Woodward has a faulty memory about whether he might have mentioned Wilson's wife to Scooter Libby, and we know that at the NY Times Judith Miller and her editors have different recollections about her desire to pursue the Wilson/Niger story. Why is Scooter Libby the only one with a different recollection than others to be indicted? And, was the Administration official who recently told prosecutor Fitzgerald about a conversation with Woodward not interviewed previously? Who else with knowledge of Plame's employment before it was publicly disclosed wasn't interviewed during a two year long inquiry? Fitzmas is beginning to look like Fitzmissing.Paul at Wizbang:
[W]hen you have a rumor swirling around Washington, you'll never be able to trace it back to the source. It's like trying to figure out who invented your favorite knock knock joke. -- Assuming you have a favorite knock knock joke.
Part of the reason it is so problematic is that despite the DU'ers claims of Roveian omnipotence, there probably never was a single source. . . Probably one tidbit of information started moving then it picked up another bit of information from another person and another and another like a snowball until it lands in Novak's column.
Next thing you know we have a 2 year investigation that still can't get to the bottom of who "leaked" the information. Personally I'll be shocked if they ever charge anyone with the actual leak. Especially if Fitzgerald keeps getting blind-sided with things like this.
1 comment:
I think the way I heard it somewhere earlier today was, "What else did Fitzgerald not know, and when did he not know it?" This is looking worse for him all the time.
Post a Comment