tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post8602828254001586734..comments2023-12-05T07:50:19.855-05:00Comments on No Oil for Pacifists: Just What We Don't Need: Another Unacceptable Candidate@nooil4pacifistshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-79703954037383469442011-05-21T09:19:55.787-04:002011-05-21T09:19:55.787-04:00Let me put it another way:
You may not want to vo...Let me put it another way:<br /><br />You may not want to vote FOR a candidate, but you can almost ALWAYS tell who you should be voting AGAINST.OBloodyHellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09992539380115488567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-69483319309014188012011-05-21T09:18:25.237-04:002011-05-21T09:18:25.237-04:00>> Another four years may result.
Only beca...>> <i>Another four years may result.</i><br /><br />Only because of idiotic notions like this:<br /><br />>> <i>whether Gingrich falls in to the Sarah Palin category: if nominated, I may not vote.</i><br /><br />Geez, gimme a freaking <b>BREAK</b> already!!!<br /><br />It would be hard to find a vaguely serious GOP candidate who would not be a VAST improvement over The Big 0.<br /><br />If NOTHING else because a somewhat divisive Executive/Legislative individual would be a substantial improvement over the abortion of a government that put out Obamacare.<br /><br />Further -- <b>AND FAR MORE CRITICALLY</b>, The Big 0's opportunity to shift the SCotUS has been close to ZERO.<br /><br />Another 4 years, and that will almost certainly NOT be the case.<br /><br />Get f***ing REAL. <br /><br /><i>Seriously.</i>OBloodyHellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09992539380115488567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-75714357078243701222011-05-20T13:23:01.065-04:002011-05-20T13:23:01.065-04:00I'm supporting Mitch Daniels right now, but th...I'm <a href="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2011/02/second-thoughts-on-2012.html" rel="nofollow">supporting Mitch Daniels right now</a>, but think re-election is more probable--and <a href="http://www.industryleadersmagazine.com/%E2%80%9Cretire-ronald-mcdonald%E2%80%9D-campaign-a-no-go-with-the-happy-meal-maker/" rel="nofollow">even McDonalds is under pressure to dump Ronald</a>. Another four years may result.@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-28219564221391378212011-05-19T12:19:13.909-04:002011-05-19T12:19:13.909-04:00I understand your pessimism, but half a loaf is be...I understand your pessimism, but half a loaf is better than none. How about a Perry/Cain ticket? I like what I hear about Cain, but although I don't want a lawyer-politician, I do think some political experience is desirable.<br /><br />Assuming the "natural born" issue doesn't derail Obama from running, I think I'd vote for Ronald McDonald rather than not vote if the the result meant O for another 4 years.sueknoreply@blogger.com