tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post6116494868338724907..comments2023-12-05T07:50:19.855-05:00Comments on No Oil for Pacifists: Compare & Contrast@nooil4pacifistshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-9941838664809916132011-02-08T11:03:17.944-05:002011-02-08T11:03:17.944-05:00HIV deaths at 10%, and that is the fourth leading ...<i>HIV deaths at 10%, and that is the fourth leading cause of death? How is that not in the headlines?</i><br /><br />Because the perps are black. Ever seen a crime report where the race of the perpetrators is omitted? Isn't that important to identifying and apprehending them? That was not a mistake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-86538548188036422612011-02-06T03:49:14.534-05:002011-02-06T03:49:14.534-05:00Don Surber has an interesting take on this:
http:...Don Surber has an interesting take on this:<br /><br />http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/29099Warrennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-75974637644016167542011-02-05T21:34:23.605-05:002011-02-05T21:34:23.605-05:00HIV deaths at 10%, and that is the fourth leading ...HIV deaths at 10%, and that is the fourth leading cause of death? How is that not in the headlines?Bob Cosmoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13420771432114368417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-85780953410621756242011-02-05T12:04:52.074-05:002011-02-05T12:04:52.074-05:00Holder's falsehood has remained on the website...Holder's falsehood has remained on the website because that lie promotes the official meme which advances the agenda. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1592476422/sr=8-1/qid=1149095247/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-6120455-2524760?_encoding=UTF8" rel="nofollow"><b>Postmodernism</b></a> rejects the very concept of objective truth, therefore Holder's assertion is HIS truth and in the postmodernist's view, thus as valid as any other...<br /><br />Once the subjective relativism of postmodernism is accepted, <i>anything</i> can be rationalized and justified. <br /><br />Thus Dostoevsky's "If there is no God (objective truth), then <i>everything</i> is permitted" <br /><br />Certainly Holder's false assertion qualifies under that rubric. <br /><br />If hundreds of women can now justify <a href="http://wizbangblog.com/content/2011/02/04/selective-reductions.php" rel="nofollow"><b>'selective abortion'</b></a> (reducing a pregnancy with multiple fetus') say from twins to a single child... simply because twins would be inconvenient, then Holder's falsehood is simply par for the course. <br /><br />People's beliefs determine their behavior, Holder's no exception.Geoffrey Britainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01663224962346593872noreply@blogger.com