tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post1455594513687789097..comments2023-12-05T07:50:19.855-05:00Comments on No Oil for Pacifists: Numbers Without Answers@nooil4pacifistshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-61893525809844609112009-10-22T22:23:33.596-04:002009-10-22T22:23:33.596-04:00>>>> No increased billings for this at...>>>> No increased billings for this attorney so far.<br /><br />I DID say:<br /><br />> Might require a change of specialization for some attorneys, but I think his policies'll be a definite stimulus to legal employment all around...<br /><br />If you want more billings, you need to specialize in racial reparations and restitution for workplace racial violations, like, oh, "Can you push that black file cabinet into place for me?"<br /><br />=====<br /><br />LOL, no sh**, the word verif is "filde"OBloodyHellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09992539380115488567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-53364814664428665432009-10-20T13:19:40.892-04:002009-10-20T13:19:40.892-04:00No increased employment for you if you're non-...No increased employment for you if you're non-union anyway. Of course, since only about 8.6% of workers in the US are union members, the increased employment is rather limited...sueknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-33178040477957522792009-10-19T08:34:00.084-04:002009-10-19T08:34:00.084-04:00No increased billings for this attorney so far.No increased billings for this attorney so far.@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-54014968496944767392009-10-18T23:02:15.310-04:002009-10-18T23:02:15.310-04:00> So now we know--no stimulus, or jobs, for us....> So now we know--no stimulus, or jobs, for us.<br /><br />I dunno, Carl, about the "for us" part -- I suspect many of Obama's policies will substantially increase jobs for attorneys for decades. Might require a change of specialization for some attorneys, but I think his policies'll be a definite stimulus to legal employment all around...<br /><br />:oD<br /><br />.OBloodyHellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09992539380115488567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-83063339145382465292009-10-18T13:02:09.304-04:002009-10-18T13:02:09.304-04:00M_O_M:
So now we know--no stimulus, or jobs, for ...M_O_M:<br /><br />So now we know--no stimulus, or jobs, for us.@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-71994127852375546122009-10-17T20:03:40.212-04:002009-10-17T20:03:40.212-04:00Economically speaking, the "or retained"...Economically speaking, the "or retained" part makes no sense in most cases. They basically wanted a list of who was working on the projects, but just because someone was working on a project doesn't mean they would have lost their job if the project wasn't there. <br /><br />The numbers don't mean anything, really. Because most of the actual jobs came in from construction, they are temp anyway (although the construction component actually IS A REAL STIMULUS).<br /><br />Figure an upper limit of 20,000 jobs.MaxedOutMamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08011469804162511617noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-76407395045024334682009-10-17T20:00:07.889-04:002009-10-17T20:00:07.889-04:00That's hilarious. I downloaded the primary spr...That's hilarious. I downloaded the primary spreadsheet and looked at it.<br /><br />The vast majority of the jobs created or retained came from the very small overall amounts dedicated to military construction and renovation projects.MaxedOutMamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08011469804162511617noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-2505442927205577652009-10-17T15:56:44.533-04:002009-10-17T15:56:44.533-04:00I wondered whether anyone would pick up on that. ....I wondered whether anyone would pick up on that. . .@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6427940.post-17093223974789637162009-10-17T15:44:53.916-04:002009-10-17T15:44:53.916-04:00> Bueller?
Considering who was saying that lin...> Bueller?<br /><br />Considering who was saying that line, a most amusing choice of quote.O Bloody Hellnoreply@blogger.com